Labour Government Announces £45 Electricity VAT Cut Amid Rising Energy Costs
Six-month measure aims to ease financial strain as energy price cap set to increase by 5.1% this October.

Image: Eddie Pollard / AI

Sarah Connor
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has announced a six-month VAT cut on electricity bills, a measure designed to provide immediate financial relief to households across the nation.
Households will see a 4.8% decrease in electricity payments starting in October, a direct consequence of government intervention. The government has mandated all energy firms, including those offering fixed-rate tariffs, to pass on the VAT reduction to every household customer.
British Gas, E.on Next, and Octopus have all confirmed their commitment, ensuring these critical savings reach consumers directly. The government guarantees the VAT reduction will reflect in the next Ofgem energy price cap.
Very senior Government sources affirm the VAT cut applies across all tariffs, including fixed rates, ensuring broad application. This measure, a cornerstone of the new prime minister's cost-of-living plan, draws funding from savings generated by the cancellation of the £1.8 billion Digital ID programme.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham stated his clear intention to provide people with 'breathing space,' injecting more money directly into their pockets during a challenging economic period. He emphasized this intervention was temporary and fully funded, with further decisions on longer-term support measures slated for the upcoming Budget.
Breathing space, injecting more money directly into their pockets during a challenging economic period.
Neil Hayes suggested the precise costing of this significant policy intervention would likely be addressed in the upcoming budget, detailing the financial mechanics. Martin Lewis noted an average of three sources confirms the Price Cap will rise by 5.1% on October 1, solidifying the £93 annualised increase on a typical bill.
Lewis also claimed that despite the VAT cut, households could still face a worse financial situation than currently, though less severe than without the intervention. Paul Lewis clarified the widely cited £45 saving represents an annual figure, but the actual policy runs for only six months, halving the immediate benefit.
The VAT cut will reduce the standing charge by about £10 annually and decrease each unit of electricity used by approximately 1.25p. The UK Debt Expert highlighted that while average home bills could be £45 cheaper from October, they would still remain around £48 higher overall compared to previous periods.
Even with the October reduction, average bills are projected to remain approximately £155 higher than at the start of the year, underscoring persistent cost pressures. Drivers who charge their electric vehicles (EVs) at home are poised to benefit significantly from the VAT cut, seeing direct savings on their charging costs.
A full charge for a 100kWh battery is projected to fall from £26.11 to around £24.87, representing a saving of approximately £1.24 per full charge, according to Carwow. Andy Burnham claimed charging a 100kWh EV from empty to full once a week could result in annual savings of around £65, a notable reduction for regular users.
Gurjeet Grewal highlighted that drivers could save close to £900 a year by charging an EV at home compared to fueling a petrol car, potentially covering an annual insurance bill. However, drivers reliant on public charging points will continue to face a 20% VAT charge, creating a significant disparity in costs for different EV users.
Vicky Edmonds emphasized that millions of drivers without driveways will not fully benefit from the policy due to their limited access to home charging infrastructure. Edmonds urged the government to implement 'real structural reform' through its Cost of Public Charging Review, asserting that the transition to EVs cannot be fair while some pay substantially more.
The transition to EVs cannot be fair while some pay substantially more.
Jarrod Birch pointed out this VAT cut coincides with HMRC's ongoing tribunal battle regarding a reduction in VAT for public EV charging, highlighting a broader systemic issue. Birch stressed the need for greater consideration of VAT inequality as the cost of public charging review progresses, noting the disparity has now widened.
He concluded that the potential savings from driving electric vehicles represent a significant cost-of-living measure that should be accessible to everyone, not just a segment of the population.